Is this pedestrian safety or just pedestrian removal?
[B' Spokes: I really love this title by Ben Ross of Greater Greater Washington. He makes some excellent points of witch I'll highlight (when reading keep in mind Maryland has the 4th highest pedestrian fatality rate): ]*******************************************************************************
...
In fact, the White Flint crosswalk was often full of people, so drivers obeyed the law and stopped more often than elsewhere. From the pedestrian's point of view, this was likely one of the safest unsignalized crosswalks (given the amount of car traffic) in the county.
The White Flint crosswalk was not removed because it was in the best interests of the pedestrians, but rather, because it was in the best interest of the drivers. Throughout the county, MCDOT encourages drivers to violate the law by leaving crosswalks unmarked, even where there is heavy pedestrian traffic.
Sadly, this is not a unique situation. Another wall was built with a similar goal in mind at New Hampshire Avenue and University Boulevard. In both locations, MCDOT could have made it safer to cross the street by redesigning the road to slow traffic and ticketing drivers who failed to yield. But it appears that this is not the approach the department has embraced. Instead, pedestrians take a backseat to the county's drivers.
.
<a href="http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/13291/is-this-pedestrian-safety-or-just-pedestrian-removal/">http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/13291/is-this-pedestrian-safety-or-just-pedestrian-removal/</a>;
What's Related