Cyclist tased while leaving an airport by bike

I was rudely accosted, assaulted with battery, and tased at Minneapolis St Paul USA international airport by Airport Police, simply for choosing to leave the airport by bicycle. I had broken no laws. I use a bicycle as a significant part of my daily mode of travel. I have legally cycled to and from airports internationally including 3 of the 4 major London airports, with no problems. I was using my bicycle completely in accord with MN Statutes and Metropolitan Airport Commission Ordinances.

But the police say he failed to obey the sign "NO PEDS BY ORDER OF AIRPORT POLICE"

http://greencycles.blogspot.com/

by B' Spokes

Like most people I live a hectic life and who has the time for much exercise? Thanks to xtracycle now I do. By using my bike for daily activities I can get things done and get an hour plus work out in 15 minutes extra of my time, not a bad deal and beats taking the extra time going to the gym. In case you are still having trouble being motivated; the National Center of Disease Control says that inactivity is the #2 killer in the United States just behind smoking. ( http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/bb_nutrition/ ) Get out there and start living life! I can carry home a full shopping cart of groceries, car pool two kids or just get lost in the great outdoors camping for a week. Well I got go, another outing this weekend.
  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Share It!

Story Options

  • Cyclist tased while leaving an airport by bike
  • 1 comments
Login required to comment
CRIMINAL COURT VICTORY!!! The jury spent the entire day in further deliberation, reaching a consensus late afternoon. Verdicts were read, with smiles of celebration from (nearly) everybody there! Here's the rundown: COUNT I. Gro** Misdemeanor-Obstruction Legal Process by intentionally obstructing, resisting, or interfering with a peace officer while the officer was engaged in the performance of official duties, and the act was accompanied by force or violence or the threat thereof: NOT GUILTY COUNT II. Obstruction of Legal Process or Arrest by intentionally obstructing, hindering or preventing the lawful execution of any legal process, or by intentionally obstructing, resisting, or interfering with a peace officer while the officer was engaged in the performance of official duties: NOT GUILTY COUNT III. Failure to Comply with a Lawful Order by willfully failing or refusing to comply with any lawful order or direction of any peace officer invested by law with authority to direct, control, or regulate traffic: GUILTY COUNT IV. Riding a Bicycle Opposite Adjacent Vehicle Traffic by failing to travel in the same direction as adjacent vehicular traffic while traveling on the shoulder of a roadway: NOT GUILTY COUNT V. Failure to Obey Official Traffic Control Signal specifically failing to abide by the posted signage prohibiting pedestrians on the roadway: CHARGE DROPPED AT LAST MOMENT BY PROSECUTION COUNT VI. Failure to Travel in Correct Direction on One-Way Roadway NOT GUILTY This is a fantastic legal victory that firmly establishes the lack of credibility of the police testimony. It is actually an ideal situation in that the case can proceed now to the appellate level where there is a much stronger likelihood of the result serving as a useful precedent, and check and balance, for police misconduct. Given that all the alleged extreme behaviors attributed to me are now swept away, the argument on the single third count can cleanly address the important question in appeal whether an order was in fact lawful at all. This will get to the heart of the Constitutional question. Further, the use of force practiced here by MSP Airport Police is now firmly established as absolutely excessive and unwarranted. A hearty 'thank you' to all family, friends and colleagues scattered far and wide around the world for your continued good wishes. This first and significant hurdle has now been overcome. Peace and good cheer to all, Stephan Orsak