City plans to install traffic circles at 5 intersections


[This is going to be bike/ped friendly??? Multi-lane roundabouts are a pain for pedestrians!]
image
By Michael Dresser | Baltimore Sun
...
The city's plans signal an important change in Baltimore's strategy for keeping traffic flowing. [and increase Baltimore's 40% pedestrian traffic fatality rate?]

"It's a new way of thinking in the city," said Jessica Keller, chief of planning for the city Department of Transportation. "It's going to take a lot of education with the public."

The intersections where the city wants to install roundabouts are at some of the most visible, high-traffic locations in Baltimore. One is at Key and Light streets --the gateway to Federal Hill, Locust Point and the rest of South Baltimore. Two are proposed for 33rd Street, where the city wants to build traffic circles near Lake Montebello and at University Parkway.

A roundabout at Park Circle would replace one of the city's most troubled intersections, where Reisterstown Road, Druid Park Drive and Park Heights Avenue come together. Another, in Seton Hill, would reconfigure the junction of Druid Hill Avenue and Paca and Centre streets.
... http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/traffic/bal-traffic-circles0522,0,993574.story

by B' Spokes

Like most people I live a hectic life and who has the time for much exercise? Thanks to xtracycle now I do. By using my bike for daily activities I can get things done and get an hour plus work out in 15 minutes extra of my time, not a bad deal and beats taking the extra time going to the gym. In case you are still having trouble being motivated; the National Center of Disease Control says that inactivity is the #2 killer in the United States just behind smoking. ( http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/bb_nutrition/ ) Get out there and start living life! I can carry home a full shopping cart of groceries, car pool two kids or just get lost in the great outdoors camping for a week. Well I got go, another outing this weekend.
  • Currently 0.00/5
Rating: 0.00/5 (0 votes cast)

Share It!

Login required to comment
[This from Portland seems to have some baring on this issue.]

Portland Press Herald coverage seems to indicate Portland is about to make another bad decision for Franklin Street. This is not a surprise since the stated design goals for this travel corridor are bad. Proper design goals would be part of wider plans for creating an equitable and efficient urban transportation system. The larger context for this process must be a culture that recognizes it needs to reverse last centuryʼs public policies promoting mass suburbanization - where bad transportation policy was the primary tool.

Rather than finding 'arterial' solutions for a limited number of travel corridors, forward looking urban design diffuses vehicle traffic across a net of redundantly connected travel corridors. This works better when traffic flows are platooned. Platooning allows traffic entering and crossing (including pedestrian traffic) more openings. While platooning often results with standard traffic intersection control, it is hurt by things that encourage continuous flow - roundabouts for instance.

Forward looking transportation design will discontinue its decades long war against pedestrian and mass transit modes of travel. Continuous vehicle flow promoted by roundabouts is inconsistent with pedestrian travel and inconsistent with stop and go bus characteristics.

While pocket parks are excellent aesthetic additions to the urban grid, roundabouts create wasted space in urban areas. The continuous circling vehicle traffic makes it useless even as a pocket park. It becomes additional dead space for pedestrians to cross, increasing distances between meaningful places.

http://web.mac.com/kob22225/Site/Portland_Press_Herald_Letters_files/roundabout2.pdf