Baltimore Spokes
Biking in Baltimore
Sign Up!
Welcome to Baltimore Spokes
Saturday, December 03 2016 @ 07:40 PM UTC
View Printable Version

Currently, what it takes to get an extra fine for killing someone.

Bike LawsDrag racing, speeding, being drunk and of course killing someone seems to meet Maryland minimum standards for recklessness,

I will assert that drag racing is still around as the only significant deterrent requires a perfect storm of several gross negligent acts.

View Printable Version

Can we answer Senator Frosh’s Questions in Time?

Bike Laws[B' Spokes: The question for Baltimore is if we can get Senator Lisa Gladden (D), District 41(410) 841-3697 to understand HB 363 and to talk with Frosh that yes indeed we have addressed his concerns. I saw a headline along the lines of "If AAA and Bicycle Advocates Support the Same Thing, Who Is The Opposition?" In short the opposition is just not understanding what this bill will do and Jim has some good examples from case law of what will and what will not fall under this law. Those that feel they have a good understanding of the issues and live in district 41 please call Senator Gladden (410) 841-3697 and talk to her or her aide that is handling HB 363 Manslaughter by Vehicle or Vessel - Criminal Negligence and see if she can talk to Senator Frosh. (Additional information here. The hearing is set for 4/6.)]
From WABA:

Thanks to the WABA members, WABA staff, Bike Maryland,  AAA, Baltimore Spokes, Adiva, and others for all of your work on HB 363. Our initial elation of finally passing the bill in the House of Delegates quickly gave way to apprehension that getting the bill through the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee this year is an uphill battle because there is so little time. Your efforts this week have persuaded a couple of Senators who were initially undecided. But Committee Chairman Brian Frosh (D-Bethesda) is skeptical.

Fortunately, Senator Frosh has been very open and transparent about his skepticism, making it possible for us to at least try to address his concerns. Right now, someone can only be convicted of vehicular manslaughter if they know that their driving creates a substantial risk of killing someone; under the Model Penal Code standard (which H.B 363 adopts), one could be convicted of negligent homicide if they should know the driving had a substantial risk of killing someone.  Last Wednesday’s Washington Post had the following account:

To Frosh, that new standard could be applied to the mother who fatally hits a bicyclist when she takes a glance at a crying child in the back seat of her minivan.

“When moments of inattention can kill somebody, that’s a terrible thing,” Frosh said. “You can lose your house, your job, you can lose everything you own in a civil suit, but do we want to send that mother to jail.”

I’ve read a few hundred cases on negligent homicide in 8 states that have adopted the Model Penal Code standard over the last several days, to see whether there is a basis for this concern. I am making a table (complete for 4 states so far) that shows the facts that do and do not result in a conviction for those states. That table footnotes the supporting case law. It may end up as part of written testimony we submit. I’ll keep inserting new versions of that table.

The Post also reported:

To thread the needle to Frosh’s satisfaction, the bill’s advocates need to define “precisely what their target is.”

Will that hypothetical lady in the minivan who looks back into a car seat and kills a cyclist be guilty of negligent homicide? From the case law I have read so far it depends on what else was going on. Here are a few examples. Under existing law, she would not be guilty in any of these cases.

  • 1. If she was driving 30 mph over the limit, or in a bike lane, or cruising down a shoulder to pass a line of cars–and then looks back at her child and hits a cyclist: probably guilty.
  • 2. If she sees the cyclist ahead, and then looks back at her child and hits the cyclist: probably guilty.
  • 3. If there is a stop sign ahead that is clearly visible, and she looks back at her child and runs the stop sign and hits a cyclist: probably guilty.
  • 4. If the road ahead is clear, and she looks back at her child for 2 seconds during which time a cyclist enters the road and she hits him: not guilty.
  • 5. If the road ahead is clear and she looks back at her child, a cyclist enters the road, she crosses the double yellow line, and hits the cyclist: not guilty.
  • 6. If she runs a red light just barely before it turns green and hits a cyclist in the intersection after it turns green: not guilty.
  • 7. If she loses control of her vehicle while driving 70 mph through a safe-turn 45 mph sign when the speed limit is 55 mph: not guilty
  • 8. If the road ahead is not clear, and she accidentally crosses the double yellow line and hits a cyclist who was plainly visible before she looked back at her child: not guilty in New Hampshire; guilty in Arkansas (if she is a professional minivan driver). So other states could go either way, and even Arkansas might reverse the conviction for a nonprofessional driver.

(I am assuming here that she invokes her right to remain silent and no passengers testify against her. Passengers saying that they warned her against something that she did will hurt her case–maybe the passengers should help with the child.)

A few decades of case law from the states that already have a law like H.B. 363 shows that the term “substantial risk of death” does not apply to the necessary day-to-day activities in which people engage, so those activities could not be a cause for negligent homicide.

If you know of any other possible fact patterns that concern Senator Frosh (or any other Maryland Senator) please let us know and we’ll see if we can find a case that is at least generally on point.

View Printable Version

AAA, lawmakers seek new auto manslaughter law

Bike Lawsfrom Getting There by Michael Dresser

But proponents argued that a simple traffic charge -- which can be resolved by mailing in a fine without a court appearance by the defendant -- isn't appropriate in a case where someone is killed through a driver's negligence.

“This much-needed legislation addresses a critical loophole that traffic safety advocates, including AAA and the families of victims have been trying to fix for nearly 15 years,” said AAA spokeswoman Ragina C. Averella. “It’s a loophole so large that negligent and irresponsible Maryland drivers who kill have been escaping through it for years."
“It is embarrassing that Maryland has this massive loophole in its law. When you look at the statutes and accompanying penalties in other states, this bill is more than fair and sensible. It provides a measure of justice for all concerned,” she [Adiva Sotzsky] said.

But Frosh said in an interview last week that drivers found to be negligent in the deaths of others can face costly civil penalties. He said his view is that in most cases, jail terms should be reserved for those who intentionally caused harm.
View Printable Version

AAA supports HB 363 but Senator Frosh is not so sure (Manslaughter by Vehicle or Vessel - Criminal Negligence)

Bike Laws Senator Frosh has been quoted in the paper saying some things that do not ring true about HB 363 and that needs to be addressed. Some quotes of Frosh in the Baltimore Sun and Washington Post, what the bill actually says and my comments:

Frosh: Already approved by the House, a bill that would change the law now is in the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee, which Frosh chairs. He says the rush of Senate business has kept him from reading it. He plans to hold a hearing next week but isn’t sure whether he will ask the committee to vote on it. “It depends on what the bill says,” Frosh said, “and whether it can be fixed and whether they can thread the needle.

B' Spokes: So to be fair he has not read the bill yet so this may be a bit of an over reaction but still his concerns necessitate a response.

Frosh: Proponents jubilation at House passage of the bill has been tempered by comments from Sen. Brian E. Frosh, chairman of the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee, expressing concerns that the law could be used to jail people over unintentional driving errors.


B' Spokes: Simple negligence still exists and is purposefully excluded in this bill to address that concern. This bill fills the GAP between simple negligence and recklessness.

Frosh: Sen. Brian E. Frosh, chairman of that panel, expressed misgivings about creating an offense carrying a jail term for conduct that was negligent but not intentional or reckless.


B' Spokes: Really, someone that drives without the standard of care that would be exercised by a reasonable person and KILLS someone should no way, no how, in all circumstances never face jail time?

Post: “For someone to demonstrate ‘substantial negligence’ is higher than ordinary negligence but lower than gross negligence,” Simmons said. “At one point I estimated that there were 30 to 40 [vehicular] homicides that prosecutors wanted to prosecute but couldn’t under today’s high standard.

Frosh: But Frosh said he's concerned about imposing harsh penalties on drivers who may have killed others as a result of "split-second negligence." "Our jails are bursting right now," he said. "To me the jails are a place for people who have done something that is intentional."


B' Spokes: Split-second negligence??? Cute misdirection but what is he saying? It's perfectly fine to take a split second to send a text message thus missing a red light and then killing people as a consequence? Frosh seems to keep referring to simple negligence and the penalty for that is still $500 max.

Post: To Frosh, that new standard could be applied to the mother who fatally hits a bicyclist when she takes a glance at a crying child in the back seat of her minivan

B' Spokes: First I would like to point out that Frosh has NOT read the bill so his assertion that a glance back is more then simple negligence may not be valid. Next, as a father of five we have ALWAYS pulled off the roadway to deal with the kids. I take exception to the assertion that a mother HAS to be distracted for a split second to deal with kids. As always we trust the courts and juries to do the right thing, if we throw that out the window there is no point to making laws.

Descending order of culpability in manslaughterSimple definitionExplanationFines
Currently Maryland only has thisManslaughterReckless, gross negligenceHigh risk and driver knows there is a high risk of death.Felony, imprisonment not more then 10 years or not more then $10,000 or both.
HB 363.will establish thisNegligent homicide (model penal code version) Substantial deviation from standard of care High risk and driver should know there is a high risk of death. Misdemeanor, imprisonment not more then 3 years or not more then $5,000 or both.
NOT HB 363Negligent homicide (2 states and DC) Simple negligence; any deviation from standard of care Driver does something where the possible risk times the likelihood of death was greater than the benefits of doing so, and death results.

B' Spokes: Jail time - We have jail time for for selling cars without a licence for crying out loud but when it comes to driving in a KNOWN (or should be known) risky way that ends up killing someone, well we'll just let that go unchecked because it was not intentional, seriously? (I will also assert one major reason why risky behavior may not seem intentional is because the MVA does such a terrible job in educating drivers about driving risks with only a 20 question test. (Other States have 100 question test.)) But at the end of the day we have to trust the courts and the juries to use this tool properly, we may never see any jail time even for the most grievous of cases as there is nothing mandatory about jail time.[1]

B' Spokes: Maximum punishments are there to cover the first time very, very close to recklessness cases. They are also there to cover repeat offenders, in spite of getting numerous tickets, there are some people that still engage in risky behavior that will sooner or later end up killing someone.

Frosh: Frosh said somebody who kills another through automotive negligence can face harsh consequences in civil lawsuits. "You can lose your house for that. You can lose your kids' college fund," he said.

B' Spokes, In Conclusion:
In 2007 The Judicial Proceedings Committee (Frosh was the Chairman) failed to bring to a vote SB 267 "the fact that a plaintiff may have been contributorily negligent may not bar recovery by the plaintiff" which means being contributorily negligent by just 1% a plaintiff can be bared from recovery of ANY AND ALL damages is still on the books and does come up on occasion.

So apparently Frosh wants it both ways, no serious misdemeanor charges AND no civil damages either. Not to mention in civil cases it is often the insurance that pays, not the driver. This is simply not right and in most states, drivers who kill can be charged with negligent homicide, if their driving is a flagrant violation of the duty to drive carefully—even if there is no proof that the driver realized they might kill someone AND on top of that most states allow civil damages based on comparative negligence (or something similar.) The loophole in Maryland is that there is no such crime and civil remedies are denied, is it any wounder that The 2010 “Allstate America’s Best Drivers Report™” has DC and Baltimore dead last?

Note: I am sending this to Frosh to see if he would like to comment.
If you want to take action this is our latest alert.
View Printable Version

FYI AAA alert on House Bill 363

Bike Laws
Take Action. Now!
You and your State Senator must act now to make Maryland roads safer!
AAA Urges Marylanders to Support House Bill 363 Which Will Strengthen Vehicular Manslaughter Laws And Close Existing Loopholes
Please Contact Your Senator Today to Urge HB 363 to Be Passed Out of the Judicial Proceedings Committee
House Bill 363 will help ensure that those recklessly negligent drivers who kill and seriously injure others can be appropriately punished.    Maryland ’s current vehicular manslaughter statute requires prosecutors to show actual intent to kill, regardless of how irresponsible or reckless their driving may have been. 

This legislation increases penalties for those who drive in such a negligent manner that it results in a crash that kills someone, or in some cases, many.

Maryland's current law is routinely allowing some drivers to get away with murder on our roads. It is reprehensible that a motorist can drive a vehicle outrageously, and kill someone in the process through his or her own negligence, and then get away merely with a fine or a traffic ticket. We are not referring to simple negligence, but negligence that is so egregious that it exceeds ordinary negligence, such as the intentional violation of several traffic laws that lead to the death of someone.

The auto club is advocating once again to pass this important legislation, to change the penal law, and call attention to Maryland's extremely lenient vehicular manslaughter laws. The loopholes that exist allow those who drive in a criminally negligent manner on Maryland roads and kill innocent people to escape without serious sanctions. For the sake of the victims and their families, it is the right thing to do and it's the right time to do it.

Over the years, AAA has seen many killers on Maryland's highways go virtually unpunished for the heinous crimes they committed behind the wheel because the standard for vehicular homicide and manslaughter are so high. Because the standard is so high, such cases are very difficult to prosecute. HB 363 will at least provide a middle-ground and criminal conviction instead of a simple traffic citation for negligent traffic offenses that result in death.

HB 363 passed in the House Chamber and the bill is now in the hands of the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee. AAA Mid-Atlantic encourages you to take action by filling out the information below and sending a letter to your Senator asking the Judicial Proceedings Committee to vote in favor of HB 363 so the legislation will proceed to the Chamber for a full vote.

View Printable Version

Shouldn't it be a crime to kill someone by driving a vehicle negligently? It's not.

Bike Laws[B' Spokes: WABA's alert tailored for Baltimore.]

Action Alert

Each year, too many bicyclists, pedestrians, and motorists die on the roadways of Maryland.  Part of the problem is aggressive drivers who speed, tailgate, drive on the wrong side of a double-yellow line or drive on the shoulder--and never yield to a pedestrian in a crosswalk.  If they kill someone in most states or the District of Columbia, a jail sentence is likely.  But not in Maryland.

A drunk driver who kills someone in Maryland may be convicted of manslaughter if they are drunk.  But otherwise, to convict someone of vehicular manslaughter requires proving that the driver knew that he or she might kill someone.  And that is almost always impossible to prove. 

A driver in Takoma Park swerved off the road and hit a 12-year old girl walking home from school on the sidewalk along Piney Branch Road.  He then made a U-turn and drove off, and the girl died.  The jury convicted him of manslaughter.  But the appeals court overturned the conviction because under Maryland law, this evidence does not prove that the driver was reckless.

A driver in St. Mary’s county decided not to clear her windshield of frost, other than a small viewing hole.  As a result, she could not see anything on the right side of the lane. While fiddling with some items on her lap, she struck and killed a father riding his bicycle on the right side of the road.  Because she did not see the cyclist, she could not be convicted of manslaughter for killing him, and was fined $500.

In most states, drivers who kill can be charged with negligent homicide, if their driving is a flagrant violation of the duty to drive carefully—even if there is no proof that the driver realized they might kill someone.  The loophole in Maryland is that there is no such crime.

But this year, the House of Delegates passed House Bill 363 which would create the crime of negligent vehicular homicide in Maryland.  If the Senate passes the bill as well, Maryland will join most of the other states in the nation by closing the loophole.  But the key committee deciding the fate of this bill killed it last year—and they may do it again this year, unless these Senators hear from their constituents.

Time is dwindling in the legislative session, and at this late stage, phone calls are the most effective means of communicating the importance of this bill.

There are three key senators on the committee who need to hear from their constituents that this is a priority.  If you live within the District of one of these senators, please make a call, stating your support for HB 363-Criminally Negligent Homicide by Vehicle.  To find your Maryland Senatorial District, click HERE.

Senator Lisa A. Gladden (District 41): (410) 841-3697

Senator Robert A. (Bobby) Zirkin (District 11): (410) 841-3131

Senator James Brochin (District 42): (410) 841-3648

*** Note these Senators are already supportive the ASK is to make this Bill a priority and to keep it as passed and amended by the House.

If you are unable to call or do not live within one of these Districts, CLICK HERE to send an email to your state senator expressing your support for HB 363.

Thank you,

Baltimore Spokes

View Printable Version

Share the Road PSA - Dont Cut Off The Bike [video]

Bike LawsThis is from DC but equally valid in Maryland:
View Printable Version

Moving right along-- Legislation

Bike LawsFrom Adiva Sotzsky, member of the Bike Maryland Task Force

We are now ready for the next stage of our efforts to enact Manslaughter by Vehicle or Vessel - Criminal Negligence

The Bill has passed the House  -- today-- Thursday March 24, 2011    vote was 137-0
We will now address the Senate.   I have 2 action items below.

A)  Please begin your contact 'trees' to have people call/email their State Senators.
  As we all know-- they only need to say that they want Manslaughter by Vehicle or Vessel - Criminal Negligence -- supported.  It is HB363 and has passed the House

      If they are unsure of their Senator, they can find this either --  
   or   by name, or county or district at

B)  Well also want to focus on members of the Judicial Proceedings Committee
        By all means, if they are your Senator - contact them
        If you want to set up a meeting to talk with them about the bill --- go for it!
View Printable Version

After 7 Years, Finally a Vote for Maryland's Vehicular Manslaughter Bill

Bike LawsFrom

For seven years, accident victim and cycling/walking advocates have been trying to close a flagrant loophole in Maryland's law to make the road safer for bikers, pedestrians and all who use the road. And for six years running, the bill would get stuck in the same committee. Over and over again.

Now, for the first time ever, the State House Judiciary committee plans to finally vote on the bill. Approval would set the stage for passage by the House by April, a gigantic leap forward towards passing this law.

Almost 5,000 people have already signed a petition urging the House to pass the bill. The petition was started by Kenniss Henry, whose only child, 30-year-old Natasha Pettigrew, was killed by a hit-and-run motorist on her bicycle last Fall. As Maryland's law stands now, no matter how reckless the behavior, short of drunkenness, the driver is likely to get off with merely a traffic violation and minimal fine. The new law would close this loophole, introducing jail time for criminally reckless drivers who kill others with their behavior.

As Bike Maryland states: "There have been far too many fatalities on Maryland roads. Motorists are not penalized adequately and get off with a minor traffic court slap on the hand." 

If you live in Maryland, there is an urgent action still to be taken. Call your Delegate today to clearly register your last minute support for the bill.

Here's how: Enter your home address HERE to identify your Delegate - your Delegate will be listed on the left side of the screen. Click on your Delegate's name for contact information. Pick up the phone and make a 2 minute phone call. Let them know you are a constituent and you support House Bill 363. It is not necessary to discuss the bill in more detail.

The bill could come up for a vote any day this week. Please call immediately to register your support. And if you haven't yet—please sign the petition.

Photo credit: Woodleywonderworks via Flickr

View Printable Version

Bill to create new crime of negligent homicide by vehicle clears major hurdle in Maryland House Committee

Bike Laws

In the Maryland General Assembly, House Bill 363 (Manslaughter by Vehicle or Vessel, criminal negligence) unanimously passed the House Judiciary Committee, with amendments. The bill would create a new crime of negligent homicide by vehicle or vessel, with a maximum term of three years.

The existing crime of manslaughter by vehicle requires proof that the defendant consciously disregarded a substantial risk of killing someone. Except for drivers who were either drunk or at least 30 mph faster than the speed of traffic, no one has been convicted unless a witness at trial testified as to the driver’s state of mind, which makes it impossible to convict most solo drivers.

For further details, please see WABA’s testimony.

Maryland is one of only a handful of states where a conviction for vehicular homicide is so difficult. Under House Bill 363, it will be possible to convict a defendant who should have known there was a risk of killing someone, without proving that the defendant actually knew about the risk.

Passing the House Judiciary Committee is a major milestone. The bill has been introduced each of the last seven years, but never brought to a vote, due to the opposition of Judiciary Committee Chairman Joseph F. Vallario (D-Prince Georges).

If you live in Maryland, please call your delegates and ask them to support the bill.  Even if you only get their staff, calls make a much greater impression than emails. But emails are certainly worthwhile if you can only find the time after business hours.

Please act as soon as you can, because bills move fast this time of year. The amended bill has not yet been posted. In the next few days, we will provide an update on the amendments and what we need to do next.

(The author, Jim Titus, is a Member of the WABA Board of Directors and resident of Prince George’s County, MD.)

First | Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 | Next | Last

My Account

Sign up as a New User
Lost your password?


Site Map


There are no upcoming events


Order: New Views Posts
Latest 5 Forum Posts
Re: Butcher's Hill t..
 By:  B' Spokes
 On:  Sunday, June 14 2015 @ 02:59 PM UTC
 Views 0 Replies 0
Butcher's Hill to St..
 By:  jparnell
 On:  Wednesday, June 10 2015 @ 06:29 PM UTC
 Views 3764 Replies 1
Re: Trader Joes Park..
 By:  abeha
 On:  Friday, March 27 2015 @ 06:46 AM UTC
 Views 0 Replies 0
Re: Netherlands Bike..
 By:  HBK
 On:  Monday, February 09 2015 @ 04:55 AM UTC
 Views 0 Replies 0
Re: Seeking route op..
 By:  William888
 On:  Tuesday, February 03 2015 @ 06:53 AM UTC
 Views 0 Replies 0

Mailing Lists

General Talk
Subscribe Archives Announcements
Subscribe Archives


Maryland should adopt the Idaho stop law.

  •  Strongly agree
  •  Mostly agree
  •  Undecided
  •  Mostly disagree
  •  Strongly disagree
This poll has 0 more questions.
Other polls | 1,209 votes | 0 comments

The state should support what kind of bicycle facilities?

  •  Off-road bike trails
  •  On-road bike accommodations only on State roads
  •  On-road bike accommodations only on County roads
  •  All of the above
This poll has 0 more questions.
Other polls | 1,216 votes | 3 comments

Who's Online

Guest Users: 97

What's New

No New Items