Are Traffic Ticket Guilty Pleas Admissible in Accident Cases?
[B' Spokes: The following article really makes me wonder if our traffic fines are too low if it is just not worth the bother to fight them. If enforcement of traffic laws is a joke and the fines are a joke does anyone really think that makes our roads safer.]
*************************************************************************************************************************************
By Laura G. Zois
Should traffic ticket guilty pleas be admissible in a civil case? Most courts, including Maryland, believe that it is unfair to defendants in civil cases to allow traffic ticket guilty pleas to hover over an accident case because tickets are - for better or worse - not a big deal to most people. Maybe the defendant pled guilty because he didn't feel like presenting a defense or taking the day off work. Or maybe the pain of sitting through all of the idiotic arguments of silly people in traffic court was just not their cup of tea. (Has anyone actually seen a decent argument made in traffic court? Does such footage even exist?)
Another school of thought - my preferred school of thought - is the "juries are not stupid" argument. Novel idea, sure. But here is how it goes. "Okay, Mr. Defendant, you skipped your criminal trial, pleading guilty, because you didn't feel like going. Fair enough. Tell the jury that."
Makes sense, right? The defendant is free to explain the circumstances of the decision to the jury. It is not unduly prejudicial or complex. Everyone gets it. Let the jury decide how much weight should be given to the evidence.