In the "Mandatory Use Poll" article, what is the *second* best reason for repeal of this law?

1/1: In the "Mandatory Use Poll" article, what is the *second* best reason for repeal of this law?

Ensure that cyclists are not ticketed for riding in the road
14.71%
Protect the legal rights of cyclists to sue for damages if struck by a negligent driver
29.41%
Remove the negative symbolism of cyclists have less rights in Maryland than elsewhere
7.35%
Remove the negative symbolism of cyclists having less right to the road than drivers
36.76%
I obey the law regardless of whether I think I'll get caught or have an accident--and I don't like having to constantly think about whether I am breaking the law as I try to ride safely
11.76%
Other polls | 68 votes | 1 Comments
Login required to comment
Option number 5 makes no sense: "I obey the law regardless of whether I think I'll get caught or have an accident--and I don't like having to constantly think about whether I am breaking the law as I try to ride safely" Don't you mean, "I ride safely/carefully regardless of whether I think I'll get caught for not obeying an unsafe law" OR "I obey the law regardless of whether I think I'll have an accident"? Personally, I ride as law-abidingly as possible, but not at the expense of my own safety, therefore, I have to ignore the mandatory shoulder/bike lane law.