Baltimore Spokes
Biking in Baltimore
Sign Up!
Login
Welcome to Baltimore Spokes
Wednesday, June 19 2013 @ 10:31 AM EDT
View Printable Version

The Many Merits of Cycling Infrastructure

Biking Elsewhereimage

Read more: http://www.citybeat.com/cincinnati/article-27635-the_many_merits_of_c.html
View Printable Version

The Return of Neighborhood Bicycle Shops: A Sustainable Community Indicator

Biking in Maryland“The communities that embrace the bicycle and all that goes with it NOW will be the successful communities of the next generation.”

–Alex Obriecht, President Bike Maryland & Race Pace Bicycles

http://smartgrowthmd.wordpress.com/2013/05/08/spoke-shops-signal-smart-growth/
View Printable Version

I am traffic

Biking Elsewhereimage
[B' Spokes: Such a shame this is not an everyday sight.]
View Printable Version

Helmet study fails to consider denominator and confuses science with policy

Biking ElsewhereVia Washcycle

...

Of course there are problems with this because it just counts raw numbers.

It doesn't consider if states with mandatory helmet laws have less cycling, and of course there is evidence that mandatory helmet laws do reduce cycling. So we have the numerator (injuries/deaths) but not the denominator (cyclists or miles biked). Here is another study that showed the same thing, but considered the change in cycling. 

 In recent years, many states and localities have enacted bicycle helmet laws. We examine direct and indirect effects of these laws on injuries. Using hospital-level panel data and triple difference models, we find helmet laws are associated with reductions in bicycle-related head injuries among children. However, laws also are associated with decreases in non-head cycling injuries, as well as increases in head injuries from other wheeled sports. Thus, the observed reduction in bicycle-related head injuries may be due to reductions in bicycle riding induced by the laws.

...

http://www.thewashcycle.com/2013/05/helmet-study-fails-to-consider-denominator-and-confuses-science-with-policy.html
View Printable Version

5 Ways Chocolate Boosts Your Workouts

Biking ElsewhereB' Spokes: A public service announcement. ;)

http://www.active.com/nutrition/Articles/5-Ways-Chocolate-Boosts-Your-Workouts.htm

View Printable Version

New Older Driver Safety Organization

Biking Elsewhere


AFODS Newsletter 
April 2013

 NEW ORGANIZATION TO ADVOCATE FOR SAFER ROADS

Welcome to the inaugural issue published by the newly launched national organization, Americans for Older Driver Safety, a non-profit project of KIDS AND CARS, Inc. Susan Cohen and Mitchell Krasnopoler founded Americans for Older Driver Safety (AFODS) following the 2011 death of their 20-year-old son, Nathan. An 83-year old driver making a right turn crossed into the bicycle lane where Nathan was riding resulting in the crash that took his life. The mission of Americans for Older Driver Safety is to advocate for safer roads for older drivers and all Americans, through driver education, assessment, retraining and transitioning; and to raise public awareness of the safety risks related to unmonitored changes in driver abilities. After more than 20 years as a practicing attorney, Susan Cohen left the Maryland Office of the Attorney General to lead AFODS and promote best practices, good ideas and top-notch research and ensure that all drivers have the functional ability to drive. Based in both Maryland and the Midwest, AFODS has had a significant impact over the past year raising awareness and advocating for safer roads across the country.  Some of the highlights and accomplishments are described below.

AFODS PUBLISHES 2013 POLICY BRIEF
Older drivers are expected to triple in number over the next fifteen years: Road safety policies are needed now. Federal recommendations, national and state-based research, and rapidly changing demographics indicate that changes to state driver licensing practices and highway policies are needed to address older driver safety.  Best practices suggest that older drivers should be renewed in-person every two years to identify changes in cognitive and physical function that affect driving. States across the country have begun to shorten driver license renewal periods for older drivers to every two years. For more read the 2013 Policy Brief: Maryland’s Older Drivers: Ensuring Road Safety.  
AFODS HOSTS MARYLAND LEGISLATIVE BRIEFING 
In February 2013 AFODS hosted a legislative briefing to inform members of the Maryland General Assembly on older driver safety concerns with Maryland’s eight-year renewal periods.  In light of the rapidly changing demographics that will double the number of Maryland drivers over 70 in just seven years and more than triple the number of drivers over 70 in 15 years, the briefing looked at the need to improve Maryland's older driver license renewal process. Counter to the trend in other states, in Maryland there are currently no special provisions in place for older drivers. Maryland drivers renew every eight years and in-person renewals are required every other renewal, or every 16 years.  A driver renewing at age 70 is not required to return to an MVA office for renewal until age 86.  The research shows that older drivers become more crash prone with age, even though they drive less.  Age-related declines in vision, physical mobility, reaction time, and cognitive processing affect the driving ability of some older adults. Based on research showing how aging negatively affects driving abilities, the U.S. Dept. of Transportation has issued recommendations to states to modify licensing procedures for older drivers that include shorter renewal periods and in-person renewals.  Maryland's practices, as of 2012, put Maryland far afield of those traffic safety recommendations. 

AFODS IN MISSOURI 
At a March 20, 2013 press conference in Columbia, Missouri, Susan Cohen, AFODS Founder, was part of a five-member panel addressing safety concerns of older drivers and the need for some drivers to move to  alternative mobility options.  The purpose of the event was to highlight a new pilot program, Mobility Transition Counseling, to facilitate transitioning from driving to other mobility options.  The Missouri Coalition for Roadway Safety, Subcommittee on Elder Mobility and Safety (SEMS), meets quarterly to address road safety concerns of older drivers and uses the slogan, Arrive Alive After 65. 
AFODS IN KANSAS
In Kansas, AFODS will join a support team on older drivers that has been formed by the Kansas Department of Transportation to determine actions to take to reduce older driver injuries and fatalities as part of the Kansas Strategic Highway Safety Plan.  The support team includes representatives from AAA, AARP, University of Kansas Transportation Research Institute and other stakeholders and experts. The team will issue a final report identifying steps to take to reduce older driver crashes.
image
image
image

AFODS IN THE NEWS  Click On Image  


EDITORIAL: Dangers of Older Drivers

Parents Of Student Killed By Elderly Driver Fight For Safer Roads
Parents Advocate Competency Tests For Older Drivers
End of the Road
The science of knowing when older drivers need to let go of the wheel
Older, dangerous drivers a growing problem
For more on Nathan's story...
Helping older drivers stay safe behind the wheel
Risks of older drivers, pushes for more stringent laws reviewed

Missouri Coalition for Roadway Safety unveils new campaign


For more information or to make a donation please contact Ms. Susan Cohen at info@AFODS.org.

Americans for Older Driver Safety
Our mailing address is:
Americans For Older Driver Safety
1001 Frederick Road #21022
Baltimore, MD 21228

Add us to your address book

Coming soon: AFODS will launch website www.AFODS.org 

Email Marketing Powered by MailChimp

View Printable Version

SMALL STEPS [or how to get into biking]

Biking ElsewhereBikeyface has another good post about biking. It's just about learning to do things, just like driving. Her steps:

image

So you can end up like this:

image

Read the full post here.
View Printable Version

Inside City Hall: Bikeshare program inches forward

Biking in BaltimoreA nice update on our bike share program.

http://www.baltimorebrew.com/2013/05/08/inside-city-hall-bikeshare-program-inches-forward/
View Printable Version

Save a tree

Biking Elsewhereimage
View Printable Version

Proposed Changes to UVC Chapters 1 and 11

Bike Laws[B' Spokes: These changes are cool! So ATTENTION MARYLAND BICYCLE LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE]
If you would like to make comments to the proposed changes to the Bicycle Technical Committee see the main page.

To highlight a few of proposed changes (my best attempt at preserving formatting):

ARTICLE III-DRIVING ON RIGHT SIDE OF ROADWAY; OVERTAKING AND PASSING-USE OF ROADWAY (Sections especially concerning bicycling)

§ 11-301 Drive on right side of roadway—exceptions

(a)         Upon all roadways of sufficient width a vehicle shall be driven upon the right half of the roadway, except as follows:

1.  When overtaking and passing another vehicle proceeding in the same direction under the rules governing such movement;

2.  When an obstruction exists making it necessary to drive to the left of the center of the highway; provided any person driving to the left of the center of the highway shall yield the right of way to all vehicles traveling in the proper direction upon the unobstructed portion of the highway within such distance as to constitute an immediate hazard;

3.  Upon a roadway divided into three marked lanes for traffic under the rules applicable thereon; or

4.  Upon a roadway restricted to one-way traffic.

(b)         Upon all roadways any vehicle proceeding at less than the normal and lawful speed of traffic at the time and place and under the conditions then existing shall be driven in the right-hand lane then available for traffic, or as close as practicable to the right—hand curb or edge of the roadway, except when overtaking and passing another vehicle proceeding in the same direction or when preparing for a left turn at an intersection or into a private road, alley, or driveway. or far enough to the right to allow overtaking and passing by faster vehicles if such passing is safe and reasonable, except under any of the situations listed below.

1.  When overtaking and passing another vehicle proceeding in the same direction.

2.  When preparing for a left turn at an intersection or into a private road or driveway.

3.  When the operator must necessarily drive in a lane other than the right-hand lane to continue on such operator’s intended route.

(c)  The intent of this subsection is to facilitate the overtaking of slowly moving vehicles by faster vehicles, and shall not require the drivers of such slowly moving vehicles to risk their own safety in order to facilitate overtaking. If there is a marked bicycle lane at the right side of the road, operators of bicycles shall not be required to use such lane.

(d)  Upon any roadway having four or more lanes for moving traffic and providing for two-way movement of traffic, no vehicle shall be driven to the left of the center line of the roadway, except when authorized by official traffic-control devices designating certain lanes to the left side of the center of the roadway for use by traffic not otherwise permitted to use such lanes, or except as permitted under subsection (a) 2. This subsection shall not be construed as prohibiting the crossing of the center line in making a left turn into or from an alley, private road or driveway.

Specific justifications for § 11-301 changes:

This section is being expanded to include all slow-moving vehicles. The changes enhance safety and clarity. An operator of a bicycle, moped or motorcycle can facilitate overtaking in a wide lane while still maintaining a position in the lane which maintains visibility and avoids potential hazards. Section (b) 3 applies to situations where the right-hand lane is obstructed or unsafe, or is a right-turn lane, or is to the right of a right-turn lane.


§ 11-303 Overtaking a vehicle on the left

The following rules shall govern the overtaking and passing of vehicles proceeding in the same direction, subject to those limitations, exceptions and special rules hereinafter stated:

(a)  The driver of a vehicle overtaking another vehicle proceeding in the same direction shall pass at a safe distance to the left of the vehicle being overtaken and shall not again drive to the right side of the roadway until safely clear of the overtaken vehicle.

(b)  Except when overtaking and passing on the right is permitted, the driver of an overtaken vehicle shall give way to the right in favor of the overtaking vehicle on audible signal and not increase the speed of the vehicle until completely passed by the overtaking vehicle. If the roadway is of sufficient width to permit safe passing, the overtaken driver shall not unnecessarily obstruct the overtaking vehicle.

Specific justifications for § 11-303 changes:

The current language in part (b) requiring an audible signal is an antiquated leftover from the days of Model T Fords and dirt roads. Then, people drove towards the center of such roads to avoid ruts at the edge. A faster driver would signal with the horn to alert the leading driver to move over. On modern roads, people normally drive near the right; therefore this instruction has little meaning. Occupying a lane is not unnecessarily obstructive if another lane is available for travel. Use of horns must be reserved for emergency situations, not to intimidate or startle slower drivers, and avoiding noise pollution.


§ 11-307-No-passing zones

(a)         The (State highway commission) and local authorities are authorized to determine those portions of any highway under their respective jurisdictions where overtaking and passing or driving on the left side of the roadway would be especially hazardous and may by appropriate signs or markings on the roadway indicate the beginning and end of such zones.

(b)         When such signs or markings are in place and clearly visible to an ordinarily observant person every driver of a vehicle shall obey the directions thereof.

(c)         Where signs or markings are in place to define a no-passing zone as set forth in paragraph (a) no driver shall at any time drive on the left side of the roadway within such no-passing zone or on the left side of any pavement striping designed to mark such no-passing zone.

(d)         This section does not apply under the conditions described in 11-301(a)2, nor to the driver of a vehicle turning left into or from an alley, private road or driveway.

(e)         Division (c) of this section does not apply when all of the following apply:

1.  The slower vehicle is proceeding at less than half the speed of the speed limit applicable to that location.

2.  The faster vehicle is capable of overtaking and passing the slower vehicle without exceeding the speed limit.

3.  There is sufficient clear sight distance to the left of the center or center line of the roadway to meet the overtaking and passing provisions of sections 11-305 and 11-306, considering the speed of the slower vehicle.

Specific justifications for § 11-307 changes:

Overtaking slow vehicles does not require as much distance as overtaking vehicles traveling near the speed limit. In particular, it is often only necessary to merge partway into the oncoming lane to overtake a bicyclist, and so the distance required for overtaking is even shorter then. Such overtaking is common and has not been shown to be a problem. Ohio, Maine and New Jersey have adopted provisions to make this legal. This change is necessary for safe and legal passing distances on many roads. The wording is from Ohio statute, and is also relevant to farm equipment and animal-drawn vehicles. See http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/4511.31


§ 11-601 Required position and method of turning

(a)        The driver of a vehicle intending to turn shall do so as follows:

1. Right turns - Both the approach for a right turn and a right turn shall be made as close as practicable to the right-hand curb or edge of the roadway. Where there is a separate lane for bicycles at the right edge of the roadway, a driver making a right turn must merge into this bicycle lane before turning.

2. Left turns - The driver of a vehicle intending to turn left shall approach the turn in the extreme left lane lawfully available to traffic moving in the direction of travel of such vehicle. Whenever practicable, the left turn shall be made to the left of the center of the intersection so as to leave the intersection or other location in the extreme left lane lawfully available to traffic.

3.     Two-way left-turn lanes - Where a special lane for making left turns by drivers proceeding in opposite directions has been indicated by official traffic-control devices:

                i. A left turn shall not be made from any other lane.

              ii. A vehicle shall not be driven in the lane except when preparing for or making a left turn from or into the roadway or when preparing for or making a U turn when otherwise permitted by law.

(b)        The state highway commission and local authorities in their respective jurisdictions may cause official traffic-control devices to be placed and thereby require and direct that a different course from that specified in this section be traveled by turning vehicles, and when such devices are so placed no driver shall turn a vehicle other than as directed and required by such devices.

Specific justifications for § 11-601 changes:

The first sentence of §11-601(a) already implicitly requires drivers to merge into a bike lane, parking lane or other special-purpose lane before turning right. Language added to §11-601(a) will help prevent the dangerous error called the “right hook”. This is similar to California CVC § 21717.

Reorganization of the section clarifies that standard rules for left turns, as well as the option to specify special rules, apply to all vehicles. Also see section 11-1208, which describes the two-step left-turn option for bicyclists.


§ 11-505--Pedestrians to use right half of crosswalks and shared-use paths.

Whenever practicable, pedestrians shall move upon the right half of crosswalks and shared-use paths, unless indicated otherwise by traffic-control devices.

Specific justifications for § 11-505 changes:

The narrowness of most shared-use paths, and the slower travel speeds of bicycles compared with those of motor vehicles, make it more practical and reasonably safe for pedestrians to keep to the right. This is the practice in most states. Then bicyclists can at least keep moving at a slow riding pace, or by walking. If pedestrians walk on the left, head-on conflicts with bicyclists occur and the capacity of the path is greatly reduced when it is congested. This addition refers to the new definition of “shared-use path” proposed for Chapter 1 of the UVC.



Please see Proposed Changes to UVC Chapters 1 and 11 for all the proposed changes.

My Account





Sign up as a New User
Lost your password?


Google


Site Map

Events

There are no upcoming events

Older Stories

Wednesday 05-Jun


Tuesday 04-Jun


Monday 03-Jun


Sunday 02-Jun


Saturday 01-Jun


Thursday 30-May


Wednesday 29-May

Forumposts

Order: New Views Posts
Latest 5 Forum Posts
 
Re: Pro Cheap Cyclin..
 By:  jasmine
 On:  Thursday, June 13 2013 @ 05:24 AM EDT
 Views 0 Replies 0
Re: The Stupid Stuff..
 By:  Pedalpedalpedal
 On:  Wednesday, April 10 2013 @ 04:31 PM EDT
 Views 0 Replies 0
Re: 3 bikes stolen
 By:  Katehanna
 On:  Wednesday, February 06 2013 @ 08:24 AM EST
 Views 0 Replies 0
Re: Seeking route op..
 By:  B' Spokes
 On:  Sunday, December 09 2012 @ 01:10 PM EST
 Views 0 Replies 0
Seeking route opinio..
 By:  weiwentg
 On:  Wednesday, December 05 2012 @ 04:59 PM EST
 Views 1425 Replies 1

Mailing Lists

General Talk
Subscribe Archives Announcements
Subscribe Archives

Poll

Maryland should adopt the Idaho stop law.

  •  Strongly agree
  •  Mostly agree
  •  Undecided
  •  Mostly disagree
  •  Strongly disagree
This poll has 0 more questions.
Results
Other polls | 81 votes | 0 comments

The state should support what kind of bicycle facilities?

  •  Off-road bike trails
  •  On-road bike accommodations only on State roads
  •  On-road bike accommodations only on County roads
  •  All of the above
This poll has 0 more questions.
Results
Other polls | 134 votes | 3 comments

Who's Online

Guest Users: 9

What's New

Stories

No new stories

Comments last 2 days

No new comments

Trackbacks last 2 days

No new trackbacks

Links last 2 weeks

No new links