City Council Votes to Increase Oversight of Bike Lane Removal
[B' Spokes: If you thought I was going to talk about Baltimore City, sorry we are still backwards. This is from New York City: (just a highlight)]****************************************************************************************************************************************************
by Ben Fried
...
Can’t argue there. Having a public process for bike lane installation is not anti-bike. What’s anti-bike is to imply that the recent expansion of bike lanes has somehow lacked sufficient public input, which is the message that comes across from the coverage of this bill .
It’s also strange that the City Council thinks it’s necessary to mandate notification for all bike lanes, but not for all changes to motor vehicle lanes. If the city wants to carve out some left-turn bays from a pedestrian median, for instance, there’s no law requiring a public hearing.
So yeah, it’s anti-bike to grandstand about the imaginary problem of community input on bike lanes when the council could be focusing on real transportation problems ...
...
<a href="http://www.streetsblog.org/2011/11/04/city-council-votes-to-increase-oversight-of-bike-lane-removal/">http://www.streetsblog.org/2011/11/04/city-council-votes-to-increase-oversight-of-bike-lane-removal/</a>;
What's Related