All earmarks are bad, but earmarks in my district are good
from Streetsblog Capitol Hill by Tanya Snyder...
Tea Party darling Michele Bachmann (R-MN) has taken a hard line against earmarks in her second term, after getting nearly $4 million in earmarks her first term. “It’s all bad, as far as I’m concerned,” she told Fox News this spring. “All this pork is bad.”
This week, she told the Minnesota Star Tribune that she wants to redefine earmarks so that they don’t include transportation earmarks. Meaning, she wants an absolute ban on earmarks, except the ones she really, really likes. “Advocating for transportation projects for one’s district, in my mind, does not equate to an earmark,” she said.
Actually, that’s exactly what an earmark is, and that’s why they’ve been so controversial. They’re one of the primary ways that the legislative branch exercises control over spending. Many lawmakers see them as indispensable, since, they assert, they know better what the needs are in their districts than federal bureaucrats in Washington
... <a href="http://dc.streetsblog.org/2010/11/18/bachmann-its-not-an-earmark-if-its-for-highways-and-bridges/">http://dc.streetsblog.org/2010/11/18/bachmann-its-not-an-earmark-if-its-for-highways-and-bridges/</a>;
What's Related