Swifter than eagles. And stolen

We treat bike theft as though it were a kind of natural event, like catching a cold or succumbing to some other morally neutral phenomenon.

When someone's bicycle is stolen the discussion is entirely about what he or she could have done to prevent it. The police talk about the need for tougher locks, and special serial numbers, and the cycling experts give out various bits of anti-theft advice. Don't have a bike that's too flash, they say. Try painting it some depressing colour, like orange or purple. Try having a basket at the front, they say, or mudguards, or anything to make your bike look a bit grungy and unappealing.

All of which advice may be well meant, but somehow makes me pop with rage, because we seem continually to be ascribing responsibility for the event to the victim, and ignoring the critical point. It wasn't some supernatural agency that nicked your bike, or nicked my bike. It wasn't oompa-loompas or fairies or bike elves. It was thieves.

<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2007/08/02/do0201.xml">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2007/08/02/do0201.xml</a>;

Comments (0)


Baltimore Spokes
https://www.baltimorespokes.org/article.php?story=200806231008050